Re: Re[2]: Benchmark Python vs Euphoria.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

akusaya wrote:

>> d:\prog\eu-2.5\bin\exwc d:\prog\eu-2.5\demo\bench\sieve8k.exw 90000
> Prime Sieve Benchmark
> Count: 1028
> time: 35.32

>> java EuSieve2 90000
> Prime Sieve Benchmark
> Count: 1028
> time: 13.75
> 
> Java is still 3x faster...

In that test Java is ~2.57x faster than interpreted Euphoria. But when I
translated/compiled it with Open Watcom v1.4, the resulting EXE performed ~3.77x
faster than interpreted Euphoria.

I've translated/compiled programs and seen improvements as much as 4.8x with
DOS/Windows Open Watcom C and 8.2x with Linux/FreeBSD GCC. You can increase speed
even more by using better compiler options in EMAKE!

We'll likely see even more speed improvements with all the v3.0 products!


Regards,
Vincent

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu