OpenEuphoria

Re: Why some people have not upgraded

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Jan 01, 2006
• 530 views

Juergen Luethje wrote:
> 
> Robert Craig wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > However, Euphoria is supposed to be a simple language.
> > I would not want to add this complexity to the front end,
> > plus complexity to the manual, as well as having newbies
> > constantly say "what are those extra files for?".
> > In theory it would be "transparent", but people would still
> > see the extra files lying around, and if anything went wrong,
> > they would wonder if they were really up-to-date.
> > 
> > At some point, I'm going to look into shrouding of include
> > files, to get a .il that can be included. I'm not sure how
> > it will go, but I'd rather do that than complicate the
> > whole process of running the interpreter. I do not want to
> > introduce another type of intermediate file.
> 
> I think this is actually the way to go! I hope it will be possible
> to create .il files that can be included (or linked or whatever).
> Very much appreciated!
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Regards,
>    Juergen
> 
> -- 
> Have you read a good program lately?

It might also be an incentive for people to register to get the binder.

--
"Actually, I'm sitting on my butt staring at a computer screen."
                                                  - Tom Tomorrow

j.