OpenEuphoria

Re: Why some people have not upgraded

• Posted by Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de> Jan 01, 2006
• 522 views

Robert Craig wrote:

<snip>

> However, Euphoria is supposed to be a simple language.
> I would not want to add this complexity to the front end,
> plus complexity to the manual, as well as having newbies
> constantly say "what are those extra files for?".
> In theory it would be "transparent", but people would still
> see the extra files lying around, and if anything went wrong,
> they would wonder if they were really up-to-date.
> 
> At some point, I'm going to look into shrouding of include
> files, to get a .il that can be included. I'm not sure how
> it will go, but I'd rather do that than complicate the
> whole process of running the interpreter. I do not want to
> introduce another type of intermediate file.

I think this is actually the way to go! I hope it will be possible
to create .il files that can be included (or linked or whatever).
Very much appreciated!

<snip>

Regards,
   Juergen

-- 
Have you read a good program lately?