Re: New Language
Mike Nelson wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of developing a Euphoria-based OOP language. It will be
> essentially
> similar to my Method Euphoria library, but will have a much cleaner syntax and
> should execute faster. In particular, I am developing a pure Eu complier which
> will be able to remove much of the OO overhead when the code allows. For
> example,
> if I define class X in a program and it has no subclasses then I call a method
> on a variable declared as X, no method lookup needs to be done: the method
> call
> can be translated into a direct routine call. I have translated the Method Eu
> standard library into the syntax of the new language and it is quite clean and
> readable.
>
> The open sourcing of Eu 3.0 opoens the possibility of a custom interpreter by
> modifying the fronmt end and attaching it to the C backend. I will be looking
> into this possibiltity as well--one that was not realistic before due to the
> speed limitations of the PD interpreter.
Hi Mike,
Yeah, the speed of the current Eu/in/Eu source held me back from
doing anything too serious with it also. I built a nice debugger
but it takes forever to load a big program (5 or more seconds
sometimes). Done in the Open Eu C source this would probably
be much much better.
Take care,
Al
E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
