Re: GET.E

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hello,

Jiri wrote:

>The notorious arm twister, Roderick Jackson just wrote:
>
> >If you still have concerns about changing print(),
> >perhaps a solution previously mentioned, a new routine
> >(e.g., put()) could solve most ills from this. It wouldn't
> >have to be a built-in; in fact, it would make sense to
> >locate it in the GET.E file, along with get(). It could
> >consist of nothing more than a call to print() and a call
> >to puts() for the space.
>
>A new routine! Give me a break, Rod. What are you going to
>use the old one for? Wear it around your neck as a trophy?
>
>jiri

Come on Jiri, we would still need the old one for the programs
already written that do stuff like this:

puts (1, "There is ")
print (1, 365.25)
puts (1, " in a year.")

so that it still prints like this:

There is 365.25 days in a year.

instead of like this:

There is 365.25  days in a year.
                ^
Notice the extra space.

later,
Lewis Townsend

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu