OpenEuphoria

RE: A Euphoria DLL?

• Posted by Jonas Temple <jktemple at yhti.net> Mar 01, 2002
• 503 views

Oh I absolutely agree.

I would definitely be willing to cough up extra bucks for the ability to 
create a .dll with a bind or binddll or whatever.  

Hear that Rob?  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  Although if it came with the 
standard Eu registered package I wouldn't complain.  :)

I guess another reason I would like this is if there is a bug in a .dll 
I created with translated code I would have to decide if the bug is in 
my code, the translated code or the compiler that created the .dll.  I 
REALLY like that if my Eu code has a bug I can just go to the source to 
track it down.  

Jonas
bensler at mail.com wrote:
> If you want to compile DLL's, you have to buy the translator. Registered 
> 
> Euphoria is cheap. It's worth having to buy the translator. That's a big 
> 
> selling feature of the translator. If Rob were to implement DLL 
> compilation directly into EU, I'd suggest to him that he distibute it as 
> 
> a separately purchasable extension to the registered version. Rob 
> already practically gives away his product. I wouldn't hesitate to spend 
> 
> an extra $20 (It's gotta be worth less than EU2C) to be able to compile 
> DLL's without the hassles.
>