RE: Future of Euphoria
- Posted by Chris Bensler <bensler at mail.com> May 27, 2002
- 538 views
Well said Richard :) Chris archetype at synaptiq.com wrote: > Hi, I'm new here, and would like to contribute what I know to the > following > subject: > > >Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 12:47:48 +0000 > >From: Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> > >Subject: RE: Future of Euphoria > >...Point 2: > >My view is ... if you want to make Euphoria more popular create > >something that will impress other people. This can include ... > >* Software of any kind, (games, business apps, utilities, libraries, > >web apps). > >* A Web page(s) - there are lots of things you can write about like: > > 1. An in depth review of contributed software in the archive, screen > >shots, instructions, comparisons with similiar software. > > 2. Getting started guide. > > 3. A tutorial on any area of programming ... a good one would be how > >to use DLL's and shared libraries! > > 4. How to write games... > >Ray Smith > > To show a timely example of this timely point, consider that I emailed > Euphoria's official email addy from the Eu site a couple days ago and > received this reply (including my question at top): > ************BEGIN EMAIL TRANSCRIPT***************** > > Do you have a list of (notable) end-user stand-alone .exe progams which > > might represent what has and can be done with Euphoria ? > > Impressive DOS Games: > LemonHeads (5Mb) > OidZone > > Go through the 900+ file Archive, > http://www.rapideuphoria.com/archive.htm > > looking at the programs that have the highest > "MicroEconomy" money - the little happy face symbol. > Those are (by and large) the best programs (or libraries). > To save space, some are not in .exe form, so you'll need to > install Euphoria first to run them. With the registered version > of Euphoria, you can make any program into a stand-alone .exe. > > Some games and finished programs didn't get much > MicroEconomy money because, while impressive, > they aren't particularly useful to the programmers who do the voting. > > Regards, > Rob Craig > **************END EMAIL TRANSCRIPT***************** > > I have to say that this doesn't quite cut the mustard, and, although I > was > very interested in Euphoria as a simpler alternative to the C+'s to > learn > (I have learned BASIC and LISP only), I'm not too convinced that it's > worth > my investment of time to learn if I wish to create professional > applications. > > I cannot say that you'll succeed very well in attracting attention if > you > don't have anything to attract attention with; furthermore, having to > d/l > and install Euphoria just to see what it can do outside of Euphoria is > mighty backwards in reasoning, not at all an impressive feat for a > programming language, and even presumes Euphorian knowledge -YIKES!!!! > Certainly having at least an excellent installer and editing environment > (I > point out a freeware HTML editor, "1st Page 2000" as comfortable ideal > to be > aspired to) would be a nice start. > > If you are concerned about Euphoria's future, you might want to take > heed to > what Mr. Rob Craig has pointed out. A quick suvey of the work done in > Euphoria shows lots of programs about programming Euphoria, with, > evidently, > only two impressive DOS games to show for it all. > (I mean no offense to the respective pogrammers, but DOS games are no > longer > considered impressive by the general public, nor by professional > programmers.) > You may have argument to this, but that's exactly as it appears to the > outsider. > > I'll be honest and tell you that I took one look at the 'officially > sponsored' editor and said "I'm not going to spend six months or a year > in > this working environment just to be able to create an appropriate > working > environment just so I can THEN begin work on an actual application - I'd > rather learn C++ with all that time since it's a given that I'll be able > to > accomplish what I wish with it." > > I think this is very unfortunate, since a simpler and versatile > alternative > to the stringent and difficult languages would certainly be welcome by > many, > I would think. Anything which teaches or shows about Euphoria is on the <snip>