Re: Qt4, Windows, and Euphoria
- Posted by Patrick Barnes <mrtrick at gmail.com> Jul 05, 2005
- 560 views
That would indeed be interesting. Sign me up scotty! On 7/5/05, Travis Beaty <listaddy at technomajian.net> wrote: > > > Hello all. > > As you may be aware, version 4 of Trolltech's Qt toolkit has recently > been released. One of the big differences is the fact that unlike the > previous versions, an Windows version has been released with a license > which allows its use for free, as long as the resulting application is > released under the GNU General Public License. > > Previously, there did not seem to be a lot of support for a Qt-based > Euphoria widget library, perhaps due to the fact that, in previous > versions, it would have been difficult to make a Windows version > (difficult to the tune of $1,800). That is no longer the case. Such a > toolkit should now be usuable under both Windows and Linux (assuming > compatibility within the user's Euphoria code), as the only difference > would be how the shared library is built ... .dll in Windows or .so in > Linux, with some transparent internal differences. In addition to > widgetry, Qt also provides other features which could be built into the > library in time, such as networking, openGL, and possibly (I haven't > explored this to see if it would be viable in Euphoria yet) even > threading capabilities. > > I have downloaded the Windows version of Qt4, and I'm currently testing > it. It is doing quite well, and in my opinion is better than GTK or > wxWidgets in a Windows environment. Again, that is my opinion only, > yours may differ considerably. > > > My question is this: based upon this latest release, and the > possibility of being truly cross-platform, would there be interest in > such a library? If such an interest exists, then I'll start working on > it, and get some sort of time line set up. I will get the basics > fleshed out, and then ask for volunteers in terms of alpha testing, > debugging, etc. Otherwise, I don't see the sense in investing the time > in a library that will be unused. > > Please think about it and let me know. > > Regards, > Travis. > > > > > > -- MrTrick ----------