OpenEuphoria

RE: Euphoria.NET

• Posted by "Daniel Kluss" <xerox_irs at hotmail.com> Feb 19, 2004
• 704 views

Well in that case the euphoria community should just boycot windows, until 
they meet our demands of utter compatability without any work on our part, 
besides who even uses windows now days anyways?
Daniel


>From: Philip Deets <philip1987 at hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Euphoria.NET
>
>
>I asked a similar question in another place, and I got this response.
>
>"Microsoft says that Win32 will remain avaliable and largely unchanged
>except for minimal support for WinFS but Avalon(2D/3D Graphics,
>Movies/Audio Layer) will only be avaliable in Managed Code(.Net).
>Indigo(P2P, Web Services, Generally Networking/Internet stuff) is also
>primarily avaliable for .Net but I think it's also compatible with COM.
>
>All the really good(And new) features in Longhorn are made IN .Net for
>.Net, third party development software may be compatible if the makers
>write a version of their language using .Net."
>
>What do you think?  I would want to use Avalon, but it looks like I
>can't with euphoria unless eu is changed.
>
>Phil
>
>Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hayden McKay [mailto:hmck1 at dodo.com.au]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2004 11:56 AM
> > > To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > Subject: Re: Euphoria.NET
> > >
> > >
> > > Win32lib.ew Will be the only library to be needing an upgrade
> > > to support
> > > Longhorn.
> > > EU will run fine without having to be ported to Longhorn.
> > >
> > > We will only need the extra Longhorn stuff wrapped into win32lib.ew.
> >
> > This is my understanding too. The low-level Windows API, which win32lib
> > is
> > using, will still be available in Longhorn. The extra goodies will be
> > available in new DLL files and new API routines.
> >
> > Actually, there have already been main new Windows facilities available
> > since XP arrived that have not been built-into win32lib (yet).
> >
> > --
> > Derek
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Philip Deets" <philip1987 at hotmail.com>
> > > To: <EUforum at topica.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:04 AM
> > > Subject: Euphoria.NET
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am concerned with euphoria's compatibility with Windows
>Longhorn's new
> > > > features.  Windows Longhorn will support all previous win32
>programs, so
> > > > eu will still work, but I think to access the new features,
>a program
> > > > must use the Longhorn API.  The Longhorn API will be very
>similar to the
> > > > current .NET .  Will euphoria be able to use features
>intended for use
> > > > by managed languages, such as C#?
> > > >
> > > > Maybe a new euphoria platform will be necessary.  Perhaps
>there could be
> > > > Linux & FreeBSD eu, Win32 and DOS eu, and Longhorn eu.  If
>this extra
> > > > platform issue could be avoided that would be great.  I'll
>leave this
> > > > issue with those who are more knowledgable than I in these areas.
> > > >
> > > > Just Concerned,
> > > > Phil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > > Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 14/02/04
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
<snip>

>
>