RE: Euphoria.NET
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hayden McKay [mailto:hmck1 at dodo.com.au]
> Subject: Re: Euphoria.NET
>
>
>
> Win32lib.ew Will be the only library to be needing an upgrade
> to support
> Longhorn.
> EU will run fine without having to be ported to Longhorn.
>
> We will only need the extra Longhorn stuff wrapped into win32lib.ew.
This is my understanding too. The low-level Windows API, which win32lib is
using, will still be available in Longhorn. The extra goodies will be
available in new DLL files and new API routines.
Actually, there have already been main new Windows facilities available
since XP arrived that have not been built-into win32lib (yet).
--
Derek
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philip Deets" <philip1987 at hotmail.com>
> To: <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:04 AM
> Subject: Euphoria.NET
>
>
> > I am concerned with euphoria's compatibility with Windows
> Longhorn's new
> > features. Windows Longhorn will support all previous win32
> programs, so
> > eu will still work, but I think to access the new features,
> a program
> > must use the Longhorn API. The Longhorn API will be very
> similar to the
> > current .NET . Will euphoria be able to use features
> intended for use
> > by managed languages, such as C#?
> >
> > Maybe a new euphoria platform will be necessary. Perhaps
> there could be
> > Linux & FreeBSD eu, Win32 and DOS eu, and Longhorn eu. If
> this extra
> > platform issue could be avoided that would be great. I'll
> leave this
> > issue with those who are more knowledgable than I in these areas.
> >
> > Just Concerned,
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> >
> >
> > --
> > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 14/02/04
> >
>
> ---
>
>
> --
>
>
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
