Re: mem_copy / foul-or-fu

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Thanks Mic,

The address for ple is open at this point in the code.
Sorry, I should've included this. 

I did however find the problem, 
I was free'ing palinfo and because it's tied to 
a structure as reference to an array of structures, 
free'ing this canceled the struct data for ple + 4.

Thanks again,

Euman
euman at bellsouth.net

> Stabmaster Mic wrote>

> >     mem_copy(at, ple + 4, 1024)
> >
> 
> Perhaps you should do:
> 
>   mem_copy(at, peek4u(ple+4), 1024)
> 
> instead ?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu