Re: mem_copy / foul-or-fu
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Aug 10, 2001
- 460 views
Thanks Mic, The address for ple is open at this point in the code. Sorry, I should've included this. I did however find the problem, I was free'ing palinfo and because it's tied to a structure as reference to an array of structures, free'ing this canceled the struct data for ple + 4. Thanks again, Euman euman at bellsouth.net > Stabmaster Mic wrote> > > mem_copy(at, ple + 4, 1024) > > > > Perhaps you should do: > > mem_copy(at, peek4u(ple+4), 1024) > > instead ?