OpenEuphoria

RE: Python games. was RE: Version 2.4 and beyond

• Posted by "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com> Feb 14, 2002
• 439 views

Ray Smith wrote:
> 
> C. K. Lester wrote:
> 
> C as faster than both Euphoria and Python ... why not just write 
> everything in C? And the same for assembler?

'cuz C and assembler are harder to learn than EUPHORIA. And I already 
know EUPHORIA.

(I know you're asking the collective "you," but I'm answering personally 
anyway.)

> But by moving to C and assembler you begin to loose some of the 
> features of Euphoria.

The only thing you lose is ease-of-use. EUPHORIA makes programming 
simple. C and assembler not so much.

> so it all a compromise between speed and features.
> 
> so use the language that has the best features for the speed you
> require.

I think that sums it up!!! :)