OpenEuphoria

RE: Python games. was RE: Version 2.4 and beyond

• Posted by Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> Feb 14, 2002
• 426 views

C. K. Lester wrote:

> That's what I said, so I emphasized the contrast: EUPHORIA is faster 
> than Python, so, all things being equal (each using a C graphics 
> library), EUPHORIA would be the faster one.

I misread your message :(

... so continuing the thread ...

C as faster than both Euphoria and Python ... why not just write 
everything in C?
And the same for assembler?  

But by moving to C and assembler you begin to loose some of the 
features of Euphoria.

By moving from Python to Euphoria you loose some of the features of
Python ...

so it all a compromise between speed and features.

so use the language that has the best features for the speed you
require.

btw, I played Pysol about a year ago. I played it on and off
for weeks and loved it! It's must be the best multi purpose card
game available. I think it even had Sokoban built in???


Ray Smith
http://www.geocities.com/ray_223