Re: translator/compiler

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Darth Maul, aka Matt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:04:56 -0700, Kenneth Rhodes <hermanhesse at EXCITE.COM>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah? Well some of us aren't that blessed. Maybe someone around here doesn't
> HAVE $12, or maybe someone here DOES have $12, but no way to get a new puter
> that actually has a HDD big enough for it(you know how HARD it is to main-
> tain a 1.58G hard drive with only 75M of space left? Don't even ask me
> where those 950+ megs went...). And why do you say LINUX instead of just
> plain "Linux"? Why you have to yell to get your point across? For heaven's
> sake...we can hear!

Since when does Linux NEED more than 1.58Gb? Linux can run on as little as 200
megs if your really pushing it. ( that means fewer cool things like perl,
python, KDE, GNOME, etc )

Linux with KDE *or* GNOME and GCC wont take anymore than about 400-500 Megs
( this is including all that great linux stuff like, file utils, almost every
compressor, dial-up software, firewalls, routing software, etc. the list goes
on and on )

Did i mention ultimate Un*x Multithreading, Multiuser that Linux is based on?

GNU/Linux vs Microcrap

the battle was over before is began.

p.s. if you only have a dial-up ISP ( like me ) and are rather sick, you can
take the few days it takes to download Linux for free.

--
could it be? no. not him. not again.
  cense

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu