Re: system "feature"
- Posted by Mike Sabal <MikeS at NOTATIONS.COM> Apr 26, 2000
- 351 views
>>> donovan at ABS.NET 04/25/00 07:37PM >>> One of the things I have run into is that under a Win32 environment the = new shell does *not* appear to inherit *any* of the environment settings = at all. ....a very messy solution which involved using getenv() and ... ---------------------- Which brings me back to my originial idea. It seems it would be better = for Euphoria to implement natively a set of file control commands similar = to what is used for directory management. As far as file naming, it could = either be OS specific (/home/mike/blahblah in Linux or C:\mike\blahblah.doc= in Dos/Win), or an URL-like format could be used and then translated = internally based on which version of Euphoria was being used. For minimalization, it could be limited to copy, rename, and delete; with = move being a procedure that calls copy and delete. This doesn't seem like = too much to ask and would greatly enhance Euphoia's ability to do things = by itself without such messy OS calls. Also, checking the archives, these are features that have been asked for = before; and while libraries exist, internalizing these primitives would = make life a lot simpler for everybody. Michael J. Sabal