Re: Robert Craig
Mike what are you trying to achieve?
You slag off the creator of a language you seek to better (by use of a
compiler) and have no respect for the one who created the language in the
first plaCE. It is plainfully obvious, for the rest of us on the list, that
you have no product and are carrying out a personal vendetta.
When you have a product, email this list, and not until, esp slagging off
Robert Craig.
Pete King.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike The Spike <mikethespike2000 at HOTMAIL.COM>
To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Date: Friday, April 14, 2000 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: Robert Craig
>?
>I might have "forgotten" to add a few lines in my previous post :p
>
>Anyways, Robert, you shouldn't be "thinking" about writing a compiler,
since
>if you are gonna follow in my footsteps and write a Euphoria to C
convertor,
>then realy, what do you have to add to the Euphoria Interpretter? Huh?
What,
>twenty lines of code?
>You strip out all the interprettation code (or leave it in <hint><hint>)
and
>encapsulate your machine_proc/func routines in the interpretter with qoutes
>(example: "void draw_line()"), then write them out to disk when you need to
>"compile" a Euphoria program.
>Easy huh?
>You are lucky, you have everything set up allready!
>All the C functions are tested and ready to use, all you have to do is
>write them out to disk.
>
>If I had the source to Ex, you know how happy I would be? My compiler set
>would be finnished by now...
>Even if it didn't feature an ASM compilation mode.
>Rob, you could have this ready before the end of the week, realy!
>Think it over, I don't care if there's a Euphoria "compiler" out there
made
>by you, my compiler is for "U4IA++", a superset of the language. Do what
you
>want, and if you need help, just hurl!
>
>
>Mike The Spike
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
