Re: Feature management
Hi Duke,
duke normandin wrote:
> I agree....some form of prioritizing should be used. However, IMHO, I think
> that at this stage of the game we, as a community should agree as to what
> *purpose*
Open Source development doesn't really work this way.
What usually happens is that someone proposes a change, it's discussed for
awhile, if most people agree the person who suggests it implements it.
You can't tell someone what to do unless you pay them ;)
Even a very insignificant change will get done before a very important one if
someone is willing to do it.
> Should Euphoria be morphed and optimized for:
> 1. x-platform games programming
> 2. x-platform web-development and backend
> 3. other x-platform GUI apps
> 4. x-platform embedded systems
> 5. x-platform general programming/scripting (like Perl maybe)
> 6. whatever.....
In *most* cases specific functionality for particular *types* of software is
provided by libraries.
It's best to listen to the library creators to help them develop libraries
that everyone else will use.
The *standard library* for instance will help!!!
(Note: Some things like threads and exception handling can only really be
provided
by the base language)
Regards,
Ray Smith
http://RaymondSmith.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
