Re: Eu Improvements consolidation

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Karl Bochert wrote:
> 
> > 
> Stricter typechecking make the code harder to write, but easier to read.
> You must invest a (very)little more writing time up front, and a
> little more discipline when using them. (many would think that a good thing).
> I appreciate that SS takes away a little of that gunslinger freedom, but
> then you don't have to use them.
> 

Yes, I agree that the stricter type checking is generally considered a
'good thing' from a computer science perspective, and I mostly agree with
that.  However, it's probably more of an emotional issue for me--just 
something that I like--and I'm not ready to give it up just yet.

It might make sense to tie it into with/without type_check or something.
But I want to be able to use the syntactic sugar, just without all of
the constraints that you've proposed.

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu