Re: Eu improvements (Part 1)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Jason Gade wrote:

> I like the idea. If I understand correctly, though, that if you use "without
> typecheck" then you will be unable to use the dot notation, correct? That is
> what I got from your original post and from the post I'm replying to. I don't
> really have an opinion about that I'm just trying to be clear on that.

That is incorrect; the second version shows the result of the
interpreter processing the file at runtime. When typechecks are
off all type-related statements "disappear" for the interpreter,
so what I'm showing is what it might do to preserve the same meaning.

he actual source is the same.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu