RE: Indepth Analyses Of Euphoria Translator
- Posted by Alvin Koffman <alvin_ka9qlq at yahoo.com> Mar 30, 2001
- 445 views
Okay let get this rigt. 1 code size I thought that was a silling point of Euphoria? It doesn't give you carpoltunel. 2 execution speeds For what? I don't get that, and if you need that kind of speed wouldn't you use asembley or FORTRAN or COLBALT or something anyway? 3 unreadable code Ah if you can play with C [I picked Euphoria because I'd never get C on my own and when [if] I ever get C that's what I'll use if needed] why not just start in C so you wont need to tweek a translation? 4 compiled runtime library's Doesn't C do that too? Just my view. Alvin 400 mhz Celeron $100 256 megs ram $200 13 gigabyte hard drive $300 Geting the OS to work priceless