1. RE: Indepth Analyses Of Euphoria Translator
- Posted by Alvin Koffman <alvin_ka9qlq at yahoo.com>
Mar 30, 2001
-
Last edited Mar 31, 2001
Okay let get this rigt.
1 code size
I thought that was a silling point of Euphoria? It doesn't give you
carpoltunel.
2 execution speeds
For what? I don't get that, and if you need that kind of speed wouldn't
you use asembley or FORTRAN or COLBALT or something anyway?
3 unreadable code
Ah if you can play with C [I picked Euphoria because I'd never get C on
my own and when [if] I ever get C that's what I'll use if needed] why
not just start in C so you wont need to tweek a translation?
4 compiled runtime library's
Doesn't C do that too?
Just my view.
Alvin
400 mhz Celeron $100
256 megs ram $200
13 gigabyte hard drive $300
Geting the OS to work priceless
