Re: misinterpreters and Azure

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

> Great!
>
> Tom, this what I needed to hear.  I will go over the structure code today,
> and see what I can help with.  As I said earlier in my initial 'plea', I am
> interested in being able to use 'Whatever' to provide access to the RISC
> chips on the Playstation, etc.   Bearing that in mind, can I concentrate my
> side of the Azure sandbox on 128-bit RISC?  This might seem outlandish, but
> its what I want to do to be able to ensure that I continue work in the the
> Non-PC future.  And Azure has obviously not been developed to the point
> that it needs major overhauls of useless or outdated code constructs.  So,
> I will go to your site and check it all out.

Well, as I have no site to check it out, that might be a slight problem :) And
Azure has NOT been developed at all, that's why I'm asking for people on the list
to help me develop it ;) The specs I posted earlier on are all that there is of
Azure right now, and judging by the total lack of enthusiasm from the group, all
that there will be ;)

If you want to start developing it, go right ahead! Just please let me in on it
too :)

If you need the specs (they never made it to the list etc.) just throw a mail at
me.




--Tom Eklöf
----
Get your free email at http://www.gnwmail.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu