Re: Building Euphoria -- what am I missing?
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yah?o.co?> Aug 15, 2007
- 577 views
Matt Lewis wrote: > What happens when you run: > > > wmake -f makefile.wat clean && wmake -f makefile.wat translator=1 > > Yes, it only makes exwc.exe right now, because that's all I really ever > use (and no one else seems to use the makefiles right now). It's been > on my todo list to make both... > > > Hmm. Just exu. > > Again, try > > $ make clean translator > > $ make clean library > > The GNU make syntax is easier for me, and that's why the command line > syntax is slightly different. > > Matt Windows made exwc.exe using that command line, but I didn't test the program. Linux made ecu, but it didn't seem to work -- I either got compiler errors when running emake or it wouldn't open *.ex files. It worked when I did both... Okay, I made both translator and library and moved them to bin. It seemed to work on a couple of programs in the demo directory, even the one ending in .ex. Windows still didn't seem to do the right thing, though. And I notice that "clean" doesn't really. And maybe "library" and "ec*" should depend on one another. I'll work on this when I get back from vacation -- no one else seems to be having problems. I don't want to bug you any more with it -- I can read docs as well as anyone and I can probably figure out how to write a makefile. -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. --John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.