Re: Building Euphoria -- what am I missing?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Matt Lewis wrote:
> What happens when you run:
> 
> > wmake -f makefile.wat clean && wmake -f makefile.wat translator=1
> 
> Yes, it only makes exwc.exe right now, because that's all I really ever 
> use (and no one else seems to use the makefiles right now).  It's been 
> on my todo list to make both...
> 
> > Hmm. Just exu.
> 
> Again, try
> 
> $ make clean translator
> 
> $ make clean library
> 
> The GNU make syntax is easier for me, and that's why the command line 
> syntax is slightly different.
>  
> Matt

Windows made exwc.exe using that command line, but I didn't test the program.
Linux made ecu, but it didn't seem to work -- I either got compiler errors when
running emake or it wouldn't open *.ex files.

It worked when I did both...

Okay, I made both translator and library and moved them to bin. It seemed to
work on a couple of programs in the demo directory, even the one ending in .ex.
Windows still didn't seem to do the right thing, though.

And I notice that "clean" doesn't really. And maybe "library" and "ec*" should
depend on one another.

I'll work on this when I get back from vacation -- no one else seems to be
having problems. I don't want to bug you any more with it -- I can read docs as
well as anyone and I can probably figure out how to write a makefile.

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu