Re: More icon res in LV
hi Chris,
I think i now get what u are saying.
Give me a link to ur website.
Jordah
----- Original Message -----
From: <cafromsw at yahoo.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: More icon res in LV
>
> I may have confused the issue somewhere along the way,
> if so I am sorry. I am trying to make a window that
> looks like a Win9x Explorer window in 'view detail'
> mode. I am assuming (possible incorrectly) that
> Windows gets it's icons from shell32.dll, that's why I
> was using those icons. I thought that all of the
> Windows 'default' icons are kept there. When Windows
> displays the icons they look correct. When I display
> them in my app they look wrong. That's why a put a
> screenshot on my website, to see if other people get
> the same results. So I am thinking that either
> Windows gets it's 16x16 icons from somewhere else or
> it manipulates the 32x32 in some way that win32lib
> doesn't. Chris cafromsw at yahoo.com
>
> --- jordah at btopenworld.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <cafromsw at yahoo.com>
> > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: More icon res in LV
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for the feedback. I still can't tell if I
> > am
> > > the only one with this problem, or if I am using
> > > win32lib incorrectly. I was hoping to hear from
> > > someone involved in the project to find out.
> >
> > U don't have to be a win32lib programmer to
> > understand how things work in
> > win32lib moreso windows!
> >
> > > If
> > > Windows can display a 32x32 icon properly in an
> > > LVS_REPORT ListView it seems reasonable that I
> > should
> > > be able to as well. I will see if I can figure
> > out
> > > how to use stretchBlt() to reduce it to a 16x16
> > icon.
> > > Sorry about the mangled code below but Yahoo mail
> > > didn't take the paste properly. Chris
> >
> > it all depends at times on the number of colors an
> > icon or image has. if a
> > high quality image ie having 256 or more colors is
> > reduced to 16 X 16. there
> > is bound to be some color loss. Try using an icon
> > editor and try converting
> > a 32X32(16bit) icon to 16 X 16 and u'll see what i
> > mean. this is not windows
> > fault. it all boils down to resolution. there is no
> > way u will shrink an
> > icon by half and expect same quality. it will have
> > to lose have the color
> > data. eg 32 X 32 displayed as 16 X 16. will cause
> > loss, what about the other
> > colours of the 16 pixels. thuink about it.
> >
> > Jordah
> > > cafromsw at yahoo.com
> > >
> > > --- jordah at btopenworld.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hi all,
> > > > The image lists were designed to hold images
> > of
> > > > same dimensions ie if u
> > > > made an image list of 16 X 16 all images larger
> > will
> > > > be cropped and those
> > > > smaller will appear "as-is". Also the imagelist
> > > > functions require a handle
> > > > because their need to make one large
> > > > bitmap(memory/compatible) that contains
> > > > all the images. Using Stretchblt alone,is no use
> > > > because it actually creates
> > > > another memory bitmap that is identical to
> > original
> > > > but stretched using
> > > > specified raster operations. The only possible
> > way
> > > > known to me at the moment
> > > > is using the output memory bitmap in the output
> > DC
> > > > from stretchblt(). so use
> > > > GetObjects() to obtain the handle of the bitmap
> > from
> > > > the outputDC. Then use
> > > > that handle. I hope i make some sense.
> > > >
> > > > Jordah ferguson
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jonas Temple" <jktemple at yhti.net>
> > > > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:49 PM
<snip>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
