RE: New Euphoria Users Website
Any response is better than no response.
How is anyone supposed to know if there is anything good (or bad)to be
had, if nobody pipes up, in either direction.
The lack of response, for whatever reason, is also a docile approach,
and produces the same effect.
Chris
Derek Parnell wrote:
> Or I didn't think much of the idea to get excited about it, so I decided
> to
> keep quiet and let those who it did interest discuss it. Sheeesh!
>
> ----------------
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Bensler" <bensler at mail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:46 PM
> Subject: RE: New Euphoria Users Website
>
>
> >
> > > The fact that the mailing list is docile, is nothing unusual, it's a
> > > characteristic of the community style.
> >
> > As a prime example of what I'm talking about. How many of you replied to
> > the "Popularity Contest"? How many of you are gonna sit there on yer
> > tush and say "yeah, what a great idea", and how many of you are gonna
> > actually get out of yer chair, and stand up for what you want!?
> >
> > This idea is NOT a new idea. I've proposed it before, a _few_ times
> > already. There is no reason we can't do it, except for the fact that
> > either:
> > A:// people are too lazy to care
> > B:// due to the nature of the mailing list, we can't collaborate well
> > enough to decide on anything
> > C:// people simply _don't_ care
> >
> > I think I saw a total of 3 or 4 replies, and none of them offered their
> > donations, only 'better' ideas. It doesn't matter how good the idea is,
> > if that's all it will ever be.
> >
> >
> > Prove me wrong.
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
