RE: AI
> From: Kat [mailto:kat at kogeijin.com]
> The human brain has compartments, shown to be specialized, but
> specialized by what, we don't know. For instance, the
> occipital lobes will
> become audio processors when sight is permanently removed, and the
> auditory section will help in sight if the sound is
> permanently removed. This
> has been shown by MRI and CAT scans, and radioactive glucose uptake
> studies, to show activity. This is what lead me to believe in
> a few smaller
> neural nets, mediated, and called into action, by a central
> processor. The
> neural nets are naturally reprogrammable, and the central
> processor needs
> to know in what order to reprogram which, in what order to
> call what function.
> As you learn, you are either stacking up if-then statements, case
> statements, or new functions. Either way, it's new code, and
> you were not
> programmed to know of the new code beforehand, so you could
> not allow for
> it's dynamic inclusion.
Why hardcode if-then statements? I think you start with a 'database' of
neural nets, perhaps with one top level net, and allow more to be created.
Now, you have a program that's really comprised of neural nets--call it
neuralscript. Disparate nets could call upon each other (subroutines) and
would be allowed to create new nets, and so forth. OK, this is pretty hazy,
but if you could start really small, it seems like you should be able to
grow it.
Matt Lewis
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
