OpenEuphoria

Re: so far so good

• Posted by Kenneth Rhodes <wolf_man_jacques at excite.com> Mar 29, 2005
• 440 views

danielmoyer wrote:
> 
> 
> > posted by: Ed Davis <ed_davis2 at yahoo.com>
> >
> > >on the "d" <a
> > >href="http://www.digitalmars.com/">http://www.digitalmars.com/</a> forums people
> > >are
> > >discussing the advantages of euphoria.
> >
> > How about a clue as to date/time of message, subject, author?
> >
> > I spent a few minutes searching, and I couldn't find any
> > discussions about Euphoria.
> >
> > I found:
> >   Phobos namespace pollution
> >   Major D Libraries (was Re: Phobos namespace pollution)
> >   GDB Hacking
> >   Passing variadic arguments through to another variadic function?
> >   Is latest recls going into next Phobos, as stated by author in recent
> post?
> >   SegmentationFault exception throwing, request for feedback - segfault.d
> >   [ANN] wxD 0.02 released
> >   Unofficial wish list status.
> >   Auto newing of classes (was: Unofficial wish list status)
> >   C++Source wishlist article
> >   OpenGL Bindings
> >
> > And scores more, but no Euphoria.
> >
> 
> Here's one that makes mention of Derek's intention to use D for part of his
> implementation of Euphoria, I think:
> <a
> href="http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/6670.html">http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/6670.html</a>
> 
> Note that perhaps there is no *discussion* of Euphoria, per se, just
> mentions in passing as Derek asks and answers questions there?
> 
> Dan Moyer
> 
> 
try this one:
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/18067
Ken Rhodes
100% Microsoft Free!