OpenEuphoria

Re: so far so good

• Posted by "danielmoyer" <danielmoyer at prodigy.net> Mar 29, 2005
• 486 views

> posted by: Ed Davis <ed_davis2 at yahoo.com>
>
> >on the "d" http://www.digitalmars.com/ forums people are
> >discussing the advantages of euphoria.
>
> How about a clue as to date/time of message, subject, author?
>
> I spent a few minutes searching, and I couldn't find any
> discussions about Euphoria.
>
> I found:
>   Phobos namespace pollution
>   Major D Libraries (was Re: Phobos namespace pollution)
>   GDB Hacking
>   Passing variadic arguments through to another variadic function?
>   Is latest recls going into next Phobos, as stated by author in recent
post?
>   SegmentationFault exception throwing, request for feedback - segfault.d
>   [ANN] wxD 0.02 released
>   Unofficial wish list status.
>   Auto newing of classes (was: Unofficial wish list status)
>   C++Source wishlist article
>   OpenGL Bindings
>
> And scores more, but no Euphoria.
>

Here's one that makes mention of Derek's intention to use D for part of his
implementation of Euphoria, I think:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/6670.html

Note that perhaps there is no *discussion* of Euphoria, per se, just
mentions in passing as Derek asks and answers questions there?

Dan Moyer