Re: Why equal(x[n], x[n..n])=0 ?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Hi Matt.

Matt Lewis wrote:

[snipped]
> > >    [n..n] IS NOT an element reference, and [n] IS an element reference.
> > Ok. But why [n..n] can't be an element reference? Why aren't they synonyms?
> 
> Because that would be wrong.  Please let this thread die....
Ok. Sorry for all the discussion.

[snipped]
> 
> 
> Please, either re-read all of the responses until you understand them, or
> stop trolling this forum.
> 
> Matt
Ok. It was not my intention to waste time of anyone. And sorry for my stupidity.

Best regards to all,
   Fernando

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu