Re: Win32lib questions
CChris wrote:
>
>
> I found some time to go to the win32libex sourceforge site. I think there is
> a need to mention the link to the page, as it may not be obvious, specially
> because of the "ex":
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32libex
Yes, when I initially registered, sourceforge denied "win32lib" as a name
because it was too generic or something, and since my work was extending
David's at the time, the 'ex' seemed appropriate.
> The site mentions as news version 59.2 being available. This is very old news.
> An update would help the visibility of the project.
> However, another version is available for download, namely v0.60.6.
> For sure, the Recent User contributions at RDS features v0.70.1.
> When browsing the svn repository, there is a 0.70.2 version as announced here
> by Derek.
Yes, the web pages need to be updated.
> Aren't there a bit too many versions mentioned or available? I am not admin
> for this project (at least I don't appear on the list), so that I cannot
> change
> it. Derek, Matt or Dan? D. Cuny is listed, but I nderstand that he hasn't been
> very active these days.
I've added you to the project.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
