Re: Rob, please make EU uncrippled...
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> May 16, 2000
- 588 views
On 16 May 2000, at 11:34, Bernie Ryan wrote: Date sent: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:34:06 -0400 Send reply to: Euphoria Programming for MS-DOS <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> From: Bernie Ryan <xotron at BUFFNET.NET> Subject: Re: Rob, please make EU uncrippled... To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU > What "registration incentives" will the compiler have ? Will it just > > give us the same Euphoria features as the interpeter. > > I don't see any advantage a compiler will bring if the core langauge > > is not improved. Speed is not an issue because the compiler will only > > knock down the loading time and probably not increase the runtime any > > large amount. Speed can and will be a problem in realtime interactivity, and in active graphics. Did you mean "not DEcrease the runtime"? >With the compiler you lose interactive debuging. Also So debug in interpreted mode. Then compile and doublecheck, then sell your application to the masses. Speaking of double checking the compiled code, the first "service pack" (pronounced like "bug fix") for win2k is out,, it's 190Megs big. > you will have to support 6 versions of Euphoria and this will > restrict > > the core langauge growth even more. Not really, but what i prolly will do is make only one or two C compilers "approved" by RDS, due to differences in compilers. Kat