Re:

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hi sergio,

----------
> οΤ: sergio <sergelli at uol.com.br>
> λΟΝΥ: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
> τΕΝΑ: 
> δΑΤΑ: Friday, November 09, 2001 17:16
> 
> Hi all
> 
> Is posible ex.exe file.ex be faster 
> tham a file.exe ??
> Why it occur ?
> 
> sergio

Imagine file.exe which you get with DJGPP,
and DJGPP's **some** functions which are 
slower than same **some** functions of WATCOM,
then file.exe you get with WATCOM will be
faster, and ever ex.exe file.ex may be
faster than that DJGPP's file.exe above.

All these things about slower/faster 
require the very careful testing on 
monotask OS, for example in plain Dos-32
mode.

Binded .exe, not compiled, may be 'more'
fast than just ex.exe file.ex.

Also these things are depending from the 
amount of free memory on your machine in 
the concrete session, and are random in 
the most cases.

Try carefully another programs, not EU's,
and you'll get same random results.

You are testing the EU programs and your 
attention is concentrated on the EU's speed.

Try for speed something *another* and
you'll see same wonderful things around
the speed, especially on Windows' back.

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu