Re:
- Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru> Nov 09, 2001
- 1842 views
Hi sergio, ---------- > οΤ: sergio <sergelli at uol.com.br> > λΟΝΥ: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com> > τΕΝΑ: > δΑΤΑ: Friday, November 09, 2001 17:16 > > Hi all > > Is posible ex.exe file.ex be faster > tham a file.exe ?? > Why it occur ? > > sergio Imagine file.exe which you get with DJGPP, and DJGPP's **some** functions which are slower than same **some** functions of WATCOM, then file.exe you get with WATCOM will be faster, and ever ex.exe file.ex may be faster than that DJGPP's file.exe above. All these things about slower/faster require the very careful testing on monotask OS, for example in plain Dos-32 mode. Binded .exe, not compiled, may be 'more' fast than just ex.exe file.ex. Also these things are depending from the amount of free memory on your machine in the concrete session, and are random in the most cases. Try carefully another programs, not EU's, and you'll get same random results. You are testing the EU programs and your attention is concentrated on the EU's speed. Try for speed something *another* and you'll see same wonderful things around the speed, especially on Windows' back. Regards, Igor Kachan kinz at peterlink.ru