wikipedia vs notable

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

The biggest hindrance to wikipedia is the need for secondary sources.

A primary source is Pete, and even my own writing. No original research is permitted.

A secondary source is someone copying what Pete said and shoves it into their own article (but not Pete or me).

Without secondary sources we are likely to fail.

How do we generate some "secondary sources"?

be well
_tom

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu