Re: Discuss changing the behaviour of append()
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Jun 11, 2014
- 4090 views
kinzz said...
jimcbrown said...
I don't see the call to normal append() from deep_append(), but I also fail to see the logic bug.
Simple logic bug. The code was wrong, not the normal append(). Why append(), if code was wrong?
Do you see my logic now? I say about the discussion logic here.
Ok, I see the reasoning.
But, I disagree - append() is wrong, not the code.
kinzz said...
Yes, Derek uses & now. He changed his primary code. He changed the code logic.
Yes, he was forced to. Because append() is wrong.
kinzz said...
See please my recomendation in 29.Re:
kinzz said...
Use & and be happy :)
Do you see sophisma or paralogismos in discussion now?
Yes, indeed. You make a good point here.
