Re: Discuss changing the behaviour of append()

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
jimcbrown said...

I don't see the call to normal append() from deep_append(), but I also fail to see the logic bug.

Simple logic bug. The code was wrong, not the normal append(). Why append(), if code was wrong?

Do you see my logic now? I say about the discussion logic here.

jimcbrown said...
kinzz said...

This is the second Derek's logic bug -

You've failed to point out a single logic bug, let alone two.

See please above once more.

jimcbrown said...
kinzz said...

and I can say nothing about his first logic bug.

Because it doesn't exist?

Yes, Derek uses & now. He changed his primary code. He changed the code logic. See please my recomendation in 29.Re:

kinzz said...

Use & and be happy :)

Do you see sophisma or paralogismos in discussion now?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu