Re: routine_id evaluation
--- Derek Parnell <dparnell at BIGPOND.NET.AU> wrote:
> Robert,
> I don't suppose you'd consider allowing routine_id to be evaluated at
> run-time rather than at "compile" time?
(I know you took this off list, but...)
I guess I finally understand what you're talking about: forward referencing
(although that's not how you're phrasing it). As with most stumpers like this
IMHO, you should be able to get around it with a little bit of indirection:
-- begin code
sequence handles
handles = { {}, {} } -- you could also use Jiri's associative lists :)
procedure do_proc( sequence name )
call_proc( find(name, handles[1]), {})
end procedure
procedure main()
do_proc( "foo1")
end procedure
procedure foo1()
-- stuff
end procedure
handles[1] &= { "foo1" }
procedure foo2()
-- more stuff
end procedure
handles[1] &= {"foo2"}
for i = 1 to length(handles[1]) do
handles[2] &= routine_id(handles[1][i])
end for
-- end code
Of course, you couldn't do exactly what you were asking, but with some slight
modifications, it should work.
=====
Matt Lewis
http://www.realftp.com/matthewlewis
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|