Re: Voting begins on removing OpenWatcom support

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
_tom said...

I have a problem running OpenWatcom.

I installed Eu4.0.5 on a netbook, N450, with Windows 7.

  • eui sanity.ex works
  • euc sanity.ex fails


    euc sanity.ex
    Build directory: ...
    Translating code, pass: 1 ... 11 generating
    Compiling with Watcom
    Compiling 1% init-.c
    Couldn't compile file 'init-.c'
    Status: -1 Command: wcc386 /dEWINDOWS /bt=nt /mf /w0 /zq /j /zp4 /fp5 /fpi87 /5r /otimra /s /Ic:\Euphoria init-.c

  • But, sanity.ex ran and compiled ok using Linux Eu4.0.5 and gcc.

If OpenWatcom does not work, then it should be dropped.

I think you may not have Watcom correctly installed / configured. I just tried 4.0.5 on Windows and interpreted and translated and compiled with Watcom, it passed.

_tom said...

If an easy to install C compiler is available for Windows users (and it is easy for developers to maintain) then that is the "best" choice.

The actual compiler choice should not matter.

I find Watcom to be generally easier to deal with on Windows (aside from 64-bits, of course). MinGW seems easiest to deal with IME under MSYS, but is slow as molasses. I often set up a Linux VM and cross compile. Mind you, this is when developing euphoria or wxEuphoria, both of which have a lot of compiling to do when I'm working on them.

Matt


Forked into: OpenWatcom install problem

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu