Re: we need official libs
- Posted by Roderick Jackson <rjackson at CSIWEB.COM> Jun 24, 1999
- 530 views
That's another function I'll vote for: 'sum'. I've run into a need for it several times before, but because writing the function for it each time was trivial, it hadn't come to mind. And I can see the need for the statistical and arccos, etc. functions. But perhaps they'd be better placed in an 'advmath.e' library? I'm sure they're commonly used, but only when serious math is needed. Then again, there doesn't seem to be a large number of these functions, so perhaps placing them with the more elementary ones wouldn't be too cumbersome... Rod Jackson ---------- From: Lucius Hilley[SMTP:lhilley at CDC.NET] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 9:33 AM To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU Subject: Re: we need official libs At 11:52 AM 6/21/99 -0400, Rob wrote: >What math functions, and what sequence-related functions >would you propose? I vote for any of these that don't currently exist. Many of these should be rather trivial to implement. But still handy if they where already in a standard math.e. <snip> atom a integer i sequence s object x max(s) min(s) abs(x) sgn(x) sum(s) mean(s) mode(s) median(s) arcsin(x) arccos(x) arctan(x)