Re: safe.e (to Rob)
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET> Jun 22, 1999
- 403 views
Hi Mark, > ...it changes all the positioning of the code and the leak is > not the same place so you don't have the problem anymore, > and can't find it." The same thing happens in C. You have a memory bug, so you recompile everything with the full-debugging option so you have a chance of finding it. Then the bug goes away! I don't think there's much that can be done about it. Keeping the files the same overall size probably wouldn't be enough. The fact that many routines are of different sizes would throw off the memory allocator enough to change all the addresses. At least safe.e is a lot better than what C provides. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/