Re: safe.e (to Rob)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hi Mark,

> ...it changes all the positioning of the code and the leak is
> not the same place so you don't have the problem anymore,
> and can't find it."

The same thing happens in C. You have a memory bug,
so you recompile everything with the full-debugging option so
you have a chance of finding it. Then the bug goes away!

I don't think there's much that can be done about it.
Keeping the files the same overall size probably wouldn't
be enough. The fact that many routines are of different sizes
would throw off the memory allocator enough to change
all the addresses.

At least safe.e is a lot better than what C provides.

Regards,
     Rob Craig
     Rapid Deployment Software
     http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu