Re: Compressing executables.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
  • Posted by ChrisB (moderator) Nov 23, 2010
  • 1110 views

Hi

As far as I'm aware, pretty favouarably. The reason I used it instead of upx, was because bound executables didn't run with upx, but startup times are perhaps a 1/2 second slower at most (vs unbound), which for the size of the program is fine. Main benefit is quicker inter surgery transfer speeds of the program via ftp. Apparently its giving me 69% compression (though not sure of the calculation)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu