Re: Constructive criticism
- Posted by DerekParnell (admin) Mar 07, 2009
- 1107 views
Please bear with me because I may be misunderstanding you.
Yes, you are, in almost every point I make, but I am sorry I am tired. There seem to be people who got what I refer to and what I have in mind, perhaps someone other can explain.
I hope so. Your posts seem to be plain enough and I didn't think I actually was misunderstanding you, so I would like to be enlightened.
You do not seem to want to improve Euphoria nor do you seem to want to use Euphoria, so (and this is not a rhetorical question) why are you here? What exactly is it that you want?
Well then ask yourself: Why should I waste my time here criticising the parts of the documentation I mind in detail? Maybe because I want them to be improved? Maybe because I do want to help? Does that make any sense to you? It does to me.
There are some "maybes" there and that is the problem. Maybe you do - maybe you don't. I don't know you at all except from these few posts of yours, and so far all I could see is "troll". I'm glad I'm wrong. I have come across people who argue about anything and tear down things with destructive criticism, just because they get a buzz from doing so. I was hoping you were not in that camp. I'll assume from now that you really are trying to be helpful and will listen closely to what you are saying. All I ask in return is that you also listen.
But OK, you all love section 2.3 and I have no valid points whatsoever, so go ahead and keep it. I still think it's a dumper and misleading on purpose.
You are being irrational and melodramatic. You have already said that some people "got" what you were saying, and I even said that I agree that the section needs updating. You have made some valid points. You have also made some incorrect ones too.
Now to the other points: In contrast to you, I treat you as a competent guy. So I assume you already know the problems in your stack implementation and the problems of COW in EU and the problems of EU's implementation.
Sorry that you feel I'm not treating you as a competent person. Is that because I don't agree with most of what you have said so far?
And no, I am not aware of the problems in that stack implementation. Can you please educate me so that I can improve? That goes also for the COW problems in Euphoria and the implementation problems in Euphoria. I cannot read your mind so I need to see what it is you are thinking. Concrete examples would be good.
