1. Re: euForth
Peter Lawrence wrote:
> 'I'm considering writing a Euphoria to Forth
> cascader, both for practice in Euphoria and
> to increase Euphoria's portability (and because
> the underlying VM sounds quite close to Forth).
> "Euphorth"?'
When I think of increased portability, Forth isn't something that comes to
mind - at least in the 'free' Forth realm. For example, it doesn't seem that
Pocket Forth (for the Mac) is compatible with Win32Forth (for Windows). I
haven't seen a BeForth.
> BTW, Forth provides a virtual memory feature in
> most implementations, which would also help.
Welcome news to me - when I used to code in PolyForth, we were restricted to
64K of static memory.
-- David Cuny
