Re: euForth
- Posted by David Cuny <dcuny at LANSET.COM> Aug 22, 1999
- 412 views
Peter Lawrence wrote: > 'I'm considering writing a Euphoria to Forth > cascader, both for practice in Euphoria and > to increase Euphoria's portability (and because > the underlying VM sounds quite close to Forth). > "Euphorth"?' When I think of increased portability, Forth isn't something that comes to mind - at least in the 'free' Forth realm. For example, it doesn't seem that Pocket Forth (for the Mac) is compatible with Win32Forth (for Windows). I haven't seen a BeForth. > BTW, Forth provides a virtual memory feature in > most implementations, which would also help. Welcome news to me - when I used to code in PolyForth, we were restricted to 64K of static memory. -- David Cuny