1. Re[2]: For Aku - BZ2 for Linux
I think just compile the source code on
http://sources.redhat.com/bzip2/
to a *.so file, and it can be used without change.
(maybe only changing "bz2" to "bz2.so")
but I haven't tried it.
K> Your, post didn't offend me, Aku.
K> I appreciate the contributions of Euphoria code you
K> have made to the community. Is there anyway to make
K> your BZ2 library run on Linux?
K> --- aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> No, I won't distribute the hacked program.
>> Sorry if my post offends you.
>>
>> I just want to let Rob know the vulnerability and
>> make it cannot be
>> changed in later versions.
>>
>> K> "You may not distribute any hacked or cracked
>> (reverse
>> K> engineered) versions of any library or
>> translator,
>> K> whether it's part of the Public Domain or
>> Complete
>> K> Edition."
>>
>> K> I am not a professional programmer, but my meagre
>> K> programming efforts have led me to a deep respect
>> for
>> K> the abilities and labors of professional and
>> skilled
>> K> programmers. Consequently, I observe the letter
>> and
>> K> spirit of license agreements - even those imposed
>> by
>> K> "The BEAST".
>>
>> K> Well, with one reservation, I refuse to surrender
>> my
>> K> first born daughter to anyone!
>>
>> K> Regards,
>> K> Ken Rhodes
>>
>>
>> K> --- aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> By changing a line in the produced C source code,
>> >> you can decrease the delay to below 0.5 second.
>> >>
>> >> But I wonder, is it legal?
>> >>
>> >> K> While looking over the bench marks document
>> from
>> >> the
>> >> K> latest Euphoria release I noticed something
>> that
>> >> K> reminded me of a question you asked in one of
>> >> your
>> >> K> posts to the forum... Why not have native OOP
>> >> features
>> >> K> incorporated into Euphoria.
>> >>
>> >> K> I think the simplest answer must be speed.
>> >> Euphoria is
>> >> K> 30 - 60 times faster than the popular
>> interpreted
>> >> K> languages which have built in OOP support. I
>> had
>> >> K> referred you to Ruby because it is a popular
>> pure
>> >> oop
>> >> K> interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times
>> faster
>> >> than
>> >> K> Ruby!.
>> >>
>> >> K> Also, recently you expressed interest in how
>> you
>> >> might
>> >> K> be able to distribute a program you had
>> written
>> >> to a
>> >> K> friend. You might also download the e2c
>> >> translator
>> >> K> and distribute the c -translated compiled
>> version
>> >> of
>> >> K> your program file... the delay time on the
>> free
>> >> K> version is a bit of an annoyance... but its
>> less
>> >> than
>> >> K> 10 secs, I think.
>> >>
>> >> K> Regards,
>> >> K> Kenneth Rhodes
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group.
>> >> FREE!
>> >>
>> >>
>> K> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group.
>> FREE!
>>
>>
>> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group.
<snip>
>>
>>
K> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
2. Re: Re[2]: For Aku - BZ2 for Linux
Thanks for the suggestion, Aku
I downloaded the bzip2 sources, compiled bzip2.c to
bz2.so, and tried using that file in place of the one
included with your library. I still get the same
error message... "bzopen not found".
I'll keep fiddling with the library and see if I can
figure out what the problem is.
Your efforts are appreciated,
Ken Rhodes
--- aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> I think just compile the source code on
> http://sources.redhat.com/bzip2/
> to a *.so file, and it can be used without change.
> (maybe only changing "bz2" to "bz2.so")
>
> but I haven't tried it.
>
>
> K> Your, post didn't offend me, Aku.
>
> K> I appreciate the contributions of Euphoria code
> you
> K> have made to the community. Is there anyway to
> make
> K> your BZ2 library run on Linux?
>
>
> K> --- aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, I won't distribute the hacked program.
> >> Sorry if my post offends you.
> >>
> >> I just want to let Rob know the vulnerability and
> >> make it cannot be
> >> changed in later versions.
> >>
> >> K> "You may not distribute any hacked or cracked
> >> (reverse
> >> K> engineered) versions of any library or
> >> translator,
> >> K> whether it's part of the Public Domain or
> >> Complete
> >> K> Edition."
> >>
> >> K> I am not a professional programmer, but my
> meagre
> >> K> programming efforts have led me to a deep
> respect
> >> for
> >> K> the abilities and labors of professional and
> >> skilled
> >> K> programmers. Consequently, I observe the
> letter
> >> and
> >> K> spirit of license agreements - even those
> imposed
> >> by
> >> K> "The BEAST".
> >>
> >> K> Well, with one reservation, I refuse to
> surrender
> >> my
> >> K> first born daughter to anyone!
> >>
> >> K> Regards,
> >> K> Ken Rhodes
> >>
> >>
> >> K> --- aku saya <akusaya at gmx.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> By changing a line in the produced C source
> code,
> >> >> you can decrease the delay to below 0.5
> second.
> >> >>
> >> >> But I wonder, is it legal?
> >> >>
> >> >> K> While looking over the bench marks document
> >> from
> >> >> the
> >> >> K> latest Euphoria release I noticed something
> >> that
> >> >> K> reminded me of a question you asked in one
> of
> >> >> your
> >> >> K> posts to the forum... Why not have native
> OOP
> >> >> features
> >> >> K> incorporated into Euphoria.
> >> >>
> >> >> K> I think the simplest answer must be speed.
> >> >> Euphoria is
> >> >> K> 30 - 60 times faster than the popular
> >> interpreted
> >> >> K> languages which have built in OOP support.
> I
> >> had
> >> >> K> referred you to Ruby because it is a
> popular
> >> pure
> >> >> oop
> >> >> K> interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times
> >> faster
> >> >> than
> >> >> K> Ruby!.
> >> >>
> >> >> K> Also, recently you expressed interest in
> how
> >> you
> >> >> might
<snip>
>
>
>
>
