1. The sad truth
- Posted by Einar Mogen <nord.staernes at ROLLAG.MAIL.TELIA.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 492 views
> Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:16:01 +0200 with subject "Re: Help > with "facing" routine" has been successfully distributed to the EUPHORIA > list (223 recipients). I wonder why so many has left the list (late in May it was about 250, IIRC) Einar (Well, perhaps it's because of messages like this, with no meaning...)
2. Re: The sad truth
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at EMAIL.MSN.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 478 views
Einar Mogen writes: >> Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:16:01 +0200 >> with subject "Re: Help with "facing" routine" has been >> successfully distributed to the EUPHORIA list (223 recipients). > I wonder why so many has left the list (late in May it was > about 250, IIRC) Late in May I announced that the mailing list was now viewable (and postable) from the Web. Many "lurkers" are now viewing it that way, instead of getting e-mail messages. They are no longer counted as "recipients". I assume that's where most of them have gone. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software
3. The sad truth
- Posted by Ad Rienks <Ad_Rienks at COMPUSERVE.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 495 views
Einar Mogen wrote: |> Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:16:01 +0200 with subject "Re: He= lp |> with "facing" routine" has been successfully distributed to the EUPHOR= IA |> list (223 recipients). >I wonder why so many has left the list (late in May it was about 250, IIRC) >Einar (Well, perhaps it's because of messages like this, with no meaning...) Well, maybe Einar, it is not what you think (that people are running away= because of things they don't like). A possible explanation can be the holidays. I myself have also contemplated to unsubscribe for the time of = my being away from home. I'm not, because the time of some 50 messages a day seems to be behind us= , and I think I can live with 10-20 a day. So if we make good and sparse us= e of the list, noone's mailbox will get flooded. TIA Ad
4. Re: The sad truth
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at EMAIL.MSN.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 481 views
- Last edited Jul 02, 1998
Ad Rienks writes: > I myself have also contemplated to unsubscribe for > the time of my being away from home. > I'm not, because the time of some 50 messages a day > seems to be behind us, and I think I can live with 10-20 a day. > So if we make good and sparse use of the list, > no one's mailbox will get flooded. I just retrieved LOG9806 (June) and posted it to "The Mailing List" page at the RDS site. It's almost 3 times the size of LOG9805 (May). No doubt the heavy message traffic has scared off a few people. If you are going on vacation, you can send the message: SET EUPHORIA DIGESTS to: LISTSERV at MIAMIU.ACS.MUOHIO.EDU When you get back, send the command: SET EUPHORIA NODIGESTS Put these commands in the body of the message, *not* the subject line. Regards, Rob Craig Rapid Deployment Software http://members.aol.com/FilesEu/
5. The sad truth
- Posted by Alan Tu <ATU5713 at COMPUSERVE.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 493 views
- Last edited Jul 02, 1998
>>>>> No doubt the heavy message traffic has scared off a few people. <<<<<< Maybe its because I check more often now (I'm on summer vacation), but it= s gotten a bit better. At least, with the web interface, and the decreased= number of pure subscribers, I don't think there's any need to use the newsgroup anytime soon. --Alan ----------------------------------------------------------- Visit my web page at: =
6. Re: The sad truth
- Posted by Robert McDougal <thedoog at MAILEXCITE.COM> Jul 01, 1998
- 475 views
- Last edited Jul 02, 1998
Does anyone know if the digest recipients are counted in the figure for the number of recipients. I know that I had thought about switching to the digest and in my opinion, (if digest folk (-: are not counted) then that's probably where most of the people disappeared to. Mind you, I also remember getting a couple that said "I cant believe... so I'm ending my connection to this listserver." Or at least something like that. I don't know. It used to be that there were flame wars (I think someone referred to it as flame-wars-R-us). It's good that we've managed to get along fairly well for a while now. Also, if the people on the digest are not counted, I personally feel that they should, but that probably doesn't matter much either. With my two cents, Robert McDougal Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere! http://www.mailexcite.com
7. Re: The sad truth
- Posted by "Graeme." <hmi at POWERUP.COM.AU> Jul 02, 1998
- 462 views
- Last edited Jul 03, 1998
At 05:20 PM 7/1/98 +0200, Einar wrote: >> Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:16:01 +0200 with subject "Re: Help >> with "facing" routine" has been successfully distributed to the EUPHORIA >> list (223 recipients). > >I wonder why so many has left the list (late in May it was about 250, IIRC) > >Einar (Well, perhaps it's because of messages like this, with no meaning...) I have been a semi active member of this list for over two years now and the trend I have noticed is a massive increase in in the volume of messages combined with a large decrease in the amount of useful and genuine programming discussion that goes on. Many people seem to think this is some kind of chat room or smat-alec competition. I am still convinced that this list is one of the best programming rescources I have ever come accross, but the rubbish to info ratio is startingto blow out at an alarming rate. Has anybody else noticed the decrease in input from many of the more accomplished programmers? I for one don't blame them, there hasn't been much worth commenting on lately. I include this message I am now writing in the 'rubbish' category (..messages like this, with no meaning ...) and I hope nobody replys to this. I do however hope that people read and consider this message. If you have a programming question; please ask it. If you have an answer to a question; please post it. If you have a good idea, or even a really good joke; let us know. If you have a non-critical bug report, tell Rob or the person whose work it is in, I'm sure they will be grateful. If you want to have an intricate ecoteric discussion about a particular subject, find an appropriate chat room or do it by private mail. If you want to spout off and kid yourself that you're really smart; get a really stupid girl/boy-friend - nobody else cares. Sorry to add yet another non-programming post. I hope this is the last. Graeme. (arrived in Townsville and paying long-distance phone rates to download this) ----------------------------------------------------