1. RE: [Win32Lib] weird RichEdit problem
Derek Parnell wrote:
>
> BTW, I think I should change win32lib to look for 32.dll before 20.dll.
>
> --
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
Why would you do that? In XP and 2000, the riched32.dll is a wrapper
around riched20.dll and is referred to as a "Rich Edit 1.0 emulator".
The name of the DLL did not change from version 2.0 to version 3.0 to
allow version 2.0 to be upgraded to version 3.0 without breaking
existing code.
Anyway, if you look for 32.dll first, you will find it and we'll have an
emulated 1.0 control instead of a 3.0 control.
-- Brian
2. RE: [Win32Lib] weird RichEdit problem
Brian Broker wrote:
>
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I think I should change win32lib to look for 32.dll before 20.dll.
> >
> > --
> > Derek Parnell
> > Melbourne, Australia
>
> Why would you do that? In XP and 2000, the riched32.dll is a wrapper
> around riched20.dll and is referred to as a "Rich Edit 1.0 emulator".
> The name of the DLL did not change from version 2.0 to version 3.0 to
> allow version 2.0 to be upgraded to version 3.0 without breaking
> existing code.
>
> Anyway, if you look for 32.dll first, you will find it and we'll have an
> emulated 1.0 control instead of a 3.0 control.
You're correct. I read the API docs wrong.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
