RE: [Win32Lib] weird RichEdit problem

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Brian Broker wrote:
> 
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I think I should change win32lib to look for 32.dll before 20.dll.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Derek Parnell
> > Melbourne, Australia
> 
> Why would you do that?  In XP and 2000, the riched32.dll is a wrapper 
> around riched20.dll and is referred to as a "Rich Edit 1.0 emulator".  
> The name of the DLL did not change from version 2.0 to version 3.0 to 
> allow version 2.0 to be upgraded to version 3.0 without breaking 
> existing code.
> 
> Anyway, if you look for 32.dll first, you will find it and we'll have an 
> emulated 1.0 control instead of a 3.0 control.

You're correct. I read the API docs wrong.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu