1. Win32lib documentation pitfall

I spent some time before understanding why my searching text backward 
wouldn't work:

<from msdn>
FR_DOWN
Microsoft Rich Edit 2.0 and later: 
   If set, the search is from the end of the current selection to the end 
   of the document. If not set, the search is from the end of the current 
   selection to the beginning of the document. 

Rich Edit 1.0: The FR_DOWN flag is ignored. The search is always from the 
   end of the current selection to the end of the document.
</from msdn>

I'm using win98 at home, and clearly still stuck with the v1.0 dll version.

I think the documentation for findText() should report this, since the 
findDown flag aliases FR_DOWN.

Does richedit v2.0 work under Win98SE?

CChris

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall

> I'm using win98 at home, and clearly still stuck with the v1.0 dll version.
??? did you check ???
> Does richedit v2.0 work under Win98SE?
... sure, works with Win95 too. Look for Riched30.exe, or better, to upgrade, if
necessary.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall

> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count?
Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls.
CChris probably installed an older  *stupid* software package that 'downgraded'
the dlls.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall

> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:21:48 -0400
> From: "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net>
> Subject: Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
> 
> 
>>> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count?
> 
> Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls.
> CChris probably installed an older  *stupid* software package that
> 'downgraded' the dlls.
> 

Just what I found out. Trying to have apps built for XP and win3.1 cooperate
under win98 /generally/ works, up to a point...
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this sort of environment.

Any idea about the strange tooltip display?

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

5. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall

Christian Cuvier wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:21:48 -0400
> > From: "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net>
> > Subject: Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
> > 
> > 
> >>> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count?
> > 
> > Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls.
> > CChris probably installed an older  *stupid* software package that
> > 'downgraded' the dlls.
> > 
> 
> Just what I found out. Trying to have apps built for XP and win3.1 cooperate
> under win98 /generally/ works, up to a point...
> I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this sort of environment.
> 
> Any idea about the strange tooltip display?

Ummmmm...what "strange tooltip display" would that be?
-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu