1. Win32lib documentation pitfall
- Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at agriculture.gouv.fr> Oct 06, 2004
- 478 views
- Last edited Oct 07, 2004
I spent some time before understanding why my searching text backward wouldn't work: <from msdn> FR_DOWN Microsoft Rich Edit 2.0 and later: If set, the search is from the end of the current selection to the end of the document. If not set, the search is from the end of the current selection to the beginning of the document. Rich Edit 1.0: The FR_DOWN flag is ignored. The search is always from the end of the current selection to the end of the document. </from msdn> I'm using win98 at home, and clearly still stuck with the v1.0 dll version. I think the documentation for findText() should report this, since the findDown flag aliases FR_DOWN. Does richedit v2.0 work under Win98SE? CChris
2. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
- Posted by "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net> Oct 07, 2004
- 472 views
> I'm using win98 at home, and clearly still stuck with the v1.0 dll version. ??? did you check ??? > Does richedit v2.0 work under Win98SE? ... sure, works with Win95 too. Look for Riched30.exe, or better, to upgrade, if necessary.
3. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
- Posted by "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net> Oct 08, 2004
- 474 views
> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count? Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls. CChris probably installed an older *stupid* software package that 'downgraded' the dlls.
4. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
- Posted by "Christian Cuvier" <Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr> Oct 08, 2004
- 463 views
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:21:48 -0400 > From: "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net> > Subject: Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall > > >>> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count? > > Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls. > CChris probably installed an older *stupid* software package that > 'downgraded' the dlls. > Just what I found out. Trying to have apps built for XP and win3.1 cooperate under win98 /generally/ works, up to a point... I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this sort of environment. Any idea about the strange tooltip display? CChris
5. Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Oct 08, 2004
- 463 views
Christian Cuvier wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:21:48 -0400 > > From: "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net> > > Subject: Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall > > > > > >>> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count? > > > > Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls. > > CChris probably installed an older *stupid* software package that > > 'downgraded' the dlls. > > > > Just what I found out. Trying to have apps built for XP and win3.1 cooperate > under win98 /generally/ works, up to a point... > I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this sort of environment. > > Any idea about the strange tooltip display? Ummmmm...what "strange tooltip display" would that be? -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia