Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Christian Cuvier wrote:
> 
> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:21:48 -0400
> > From: "Wolf" <wolfritz at king.igs.net>
> > Subject: Re: Win32lib documentation pitfall
> > 
> > 
> >>> Riched30.exe? I have Riched32.dll , does that count?
> > 
> > Riched30.exe is a Microsoft upgrade package, both riched20/32 dlls.
> > CChris probably installed an older  *stupid* software package that
> > 'downgraded' the dlls.
> > 
> 
> Just what I found out. Trying to have apps built for XP and win3.1 cooperate
> under win98 /generally/ works, up to a point...
> I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this sort of environment.
> 
> Any idea about the strange tooltip display?

Ummmmm...what "strange tooltip display" would that be?
-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu