1. arrgh
Please help me. I am trying to load the demo programs into the editor in
order to study them. Unfortuanately, I am not having anyluck. When I load
files using the names of the demo programs, I get new files. It may be
significant that I do not know anything at all about working in dos.
Thanks and God bless,
George
And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
2. Re: arrgh
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM>
Nov 11, 1999
-
Last edited Nov 12, 1999
Hello,
>Please help me. I am trying to load the demo programs into the editor in
>order to study them. Unfortuanately, I am not having anyluck. When I load
>files using the names of the demo programs, I get new files. It may be
>significant that I do not know anything at all about working in dos.
Hello,
It's been a while since I used the "ed.ex" editor (that IS
what you're talking about, right) but lets see what I can
remember.
I beleive you can do the following at the dos prompt:
ed.bat <path>\<FileName>
<path> is the path to the demo program
<FileName> is the name of the demo program
if you don't provide the path then it will create a new
file by that name in the current directory. I think you
can open a file in the editor as well by pressing ESC and
then 'O' or 'L' or something but not sure.
I would suggest using a different editor if you have further
trouble. You should be able to find some on the web site:
http://rapideuphoria.com
goto: Recent User Contributions
and search for "editor"
later,
Lewis Townsend
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
3. Re: arrgh
George Christovich wrote:
>
> Please help me. I am trying to load the demo programs into the editor in
> order to study them. Unfortuanately, I am not having anyluck. When I load
> files using the names of the demo programs, I get new files. It may be
> significant that I do not know anything at all about working in dos.
>
> Thanks and God bless,
> George
>
> And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
I am assuming you're using Win95. Win98 and others may vary.
One thing I have noticed: right before you enter the command "ed filename.ex"
into "Run..." under "Start" have a "My Computer" window open and active
containing "filename.ex". Windows will look in the "active" My computer
directory before anything else.
This may or may not work for you, I HTH.
--
"Only when no one replies to spam will it go away."
If someone tries to sell you something via
unsolicited email, don't buy it.
See http://www.spamcop.net/ and fight back
Nic (RedWord)Smith
http://nic.dreamhost.com
4. Re: arrgh
----- Original Message -----
From: George Christovich <jorj at TICNET.COM>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 4:48 PM
> Thanks and God bless,
> George
>
> And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
George,
would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
Kat
5. Re: arrgh
It's a one-line signature. If it's too much to handle, get off the 'net
because you're going to see a lot of stuff you might want to cry about.
< |<
Get a life. Get Jesus.
> > Thanks and God bless,
> > George
> >
> > And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
>
> George,
>
> would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
>
> Kat
6. Re: arrgh
George,
She was meerly asking you not to so grandly promote your faith in what is
supposed to be a neutral envronment. as a note you might see a few things
you don't want to see either.
Blessed Be,
DragonEagle
And It harm none shall be the whole of the law
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:47:40 -0600, C. K. Lester wrote:
> It's a one-line signature. If it's too much to handle, get off the 'net
> because you're going to see a lot of stuff you might want to cry about.
>
>
> < |<
>
> Get a life. Get Jesus.
>
> > > Thanks and God bless,
> > > George
> > >
> > > And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
> >
> > George,
> >
> > would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
> >
> > Kat
________________________________________________________________
Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com
Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com
7. Re: arrgh
>> Thanks and God bless,
>> George
>>
>> And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
>
>George,
>
>would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
>
>Kat
Kat, would you mind not starting a flame war here?
George, please don't overdo it with the religious quotes. I may share your
beliefs, but that doesn't mean I put them in every e-mail message I write.
Browbeating people with your beliefs is not going to win you any "converts,"
unless you wish to employ forced baptisms and Crusade-style tactics.
And if either of you (or anybody else, for that matter) wishes to continue
this "discussion," please send your comments directly to the person in
question -- don't torture the other poor souls on this list.
Whoops, I said "souls" -- I wonder if I offended anybody? 
Hep yadda,
Gabriel Boehme
----------
Religious liberty might be supposed to mean that everybody is free to
discuss religion. In practice it means that hardly anybody is allowed to
mention it.
G.K. Chesterton
----------
8. Re: arrgh
I'm not George. George has yet to respond, and might not because it
might not be worth it!
However, again, it's a simple signature line... easily overlooked if one
can, easily ignored if one can't.
Saying that he was "grandly promoting" his faith is beyond ridiculous.
The fact that Kat responded has done more to "promote" anything than the
original one-line that sparked her comment! She should have just shut up
about it and all would've been well.
Seems that George worships the creator while you guys worship the created.
Funny stuff.
< |<
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Euphoria Programming for MS-DOS
> [mailto:EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU]On Behalf Of E. Allen Soard
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 5:46 PM
> To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
> Subject: Re: arrgh
>
>
> George,
> She was meerly asking you not to so grandly promote your faith in what is
> supposed to be a neutral envronment. as a note you might see a few things
> you don't want to see either.
>
> Blessed Be,
> DragonEagle
>
> And It harm none shall be the whole of the law
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:47:40 -0600, C. K. Lester wrote:
>
> > It's a one-line signature. If it's too much to handle, get off the 'net
> > because you're going to see a lot of stuff you might want to cry about.
> >
> >
> > < |<
> >
> > Get a life. Get Jesus.
> >
> > > > Thanks and God bless,
> > > > George
> > > >
> > > > And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
> > >
> > > George,
> > >
> > > would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
> > >
> > > Kat
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com
> Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com
>
9. Re: arrgh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Euphoria Programming for MS-DOS
> [mailto:EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU]On Behalf Of Boehme, Gabriel
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 5:41 PM
> To: EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
> Subject: Re: arrgh
>
>
> >> Thanks and God bless,
> >> George
> >>
> >> And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
> >
> >George,
> >
> >would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
> >
> >Kat
>
> Kat, would you mind not starting a flame war here?
Too late! Arrgh! (Original topic of thread)
> George, please don't overdo it with the religious quotes.
One little line causes all this hubub. Interesting stuff. I guess it's like
a grain of sand in one's bed, eh?
> Browbeating people with your beliefs is not going to win you any
> "converts,"
Browbeating?!?! Sheesh. You'd think the Catholics were back with the
Inquisition the way you guys are describing his parting quote line.
> And if either of you (or anybody else, for that matter) wishes to continue
> this "discussion," please send your comments directly to the person in
> question -- don't torture the other poor souls on this list.
>
> Whoops, I said "souls" -- I wonder if I offended anybody?
>
> Hep yadda,
> Gabriel Boehme
What does hep yadda mean?
Thanks!
< |<
10. Re: arrgh
*whimper* Thats probably why I stopped with my "Blessed Be!" signatures... to
avoid such a "ideaology" conflict. (Tho only one noted that Blessed Be was a
Wiccan term (for the most part, that is))
My $.02
--"LEVIATHAN"
11. Re: arrgh
- Posted by Alyne & Warren <WCBaker at HOME.COM>
Nov 11, 1999
-
Last edited Nov 12, 1999
Subject: Re: arrgh
> > Thanks and God bless,
> > George
> > And the word became flesh and dwelt among us...
> George,
> would you mind not promoting your mythology as if it were fact here?
> Kat
I have to agree with Kat here. I don't promote companies or some
particular deity with which I am enamoured at this point in time. You are
on the Euphoria list. Please refrain from non-Euphoria promotions.
Thanks, George!
--Satan
12. Re: arrgh
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, LEVIATHAN wrote:
> *whimper* Thats probably why I stopped with my "Blessed Be!" signatures... to
> avoid such a "ideaology" conflict. (Tho only one noted that Blessed Be was a
> Wiccan term (for the most part, that is))
Hey, I think most of us knew that. But your posts are interesting, and sigs
are really easy to just ignore. Kinda like those "this program is sponsored
by..." messages on the radio. Does anybody really remember who sponsored
that program? Does anyone even care?
Irv - drink Fosters
Aargh! I've just created another alcoholic!
13. Re: arrgh
Leviathan wrote:
> *whimper* Thats probably why I stopped with my "Blessed Be!"
> signatures... to avoid such a "ideaology" conflict. (Tho only one
> noted that Blessed Be was a Wiccan term (for the most part,
> that is))
I thought it was a reference to the BeOS.
-- David Cuny
